Thursday, January 21, 2010

IU 67 Penn St 61

Well, well, well.  Let's take a look at where we stand after tonight's win:
  • IU's first road win
  • 2 conference wins in a row
  • 3-3 conference record
  • Tied for 5th in the Big Ten
Pretty damn good.  Some might say that we just beat a team that is winless in conference play, but I really don't give a shit about that right now.  They had to get their first road win at some point and there was no better time than tonight in my eyes.

I thought this was a great team win tonight.  IU got contributions from several players.  The Hoosiers looked ready to play and broke out to a 23-12 lead.  That would turn out to be the biggest lead of the game and I believe there was only one possession with a double-digit lead.

IU held a 35-28 lead at halftime and their balanced scoring in the half was pretty amazing:
  • 6 - Watford
  • 6 - Jones
  • 6 - Rivers
  • 6 - Hulls
  • 6 - Elston
  • 5 - Dumes
IU's toughest stretch came early in the second half.  After an IU bucket on their first possession, Penn State went on a 12-3 run and tied the score at 40.  But that would be the only tie of the game and IU would immediately answer in a big way.  The Hoosiers rattled a quick 10-2 run of their own that consisted of a nice bucket from Verdell, a Dumes 3, Verdell 1-2 FTs, a Dumes driving bucket, and a Dumes jumper. 

As you can see, Dumes came up big when IU needed to answer and that run pushed the lead back to 8 points at 50-42 with 10 minutes to go.  Dumes then had a turnover and a bad shot and the lead quickly shrank to 4 points.  But then Dumes answered again with another bomb.  So, even with a couple bad plays mixed in there, the good Devan greatly outweighed the bad Devan.

The lead would mostly stay in the 3 to 7 point range the rest of the way.  There was one more stretch with about 5 minutes to go that started to look scary for the Hoosiers.  A couple turnovers and several stupid fouls were the problem.  One play really stood out when Verdell had a bad turnover way out top that led to a break-away for Penn State.  And then wouldn't you know it, who else but Tom Pritchard comes in and commits a pussyfoot foul that leads to a 3-point play.  The lead was again down to 3 at 58-55 with 4:38 to play.  I appreciate Pritchard's hustle, but if you are going to foul in that situation, you can't let them get the basket too.

From that point forward, I was impressed with how the Hoosiers closed out the game.  The Nittany Lions helped with several missed 3-pointers, but the Hoosiers made the following key plays down the stretch:
  • Watford with a nice post-up bucket
  • Watford offensive rebound
  • Verdell Jones 3-pointer (created by the Watford offensive rebound)
  • Watford offensive rebound
  • Verdell with one of his patented sneaky moves where he gets into the lane then pivots for the little fade-away (again, created by the Watford offensive rebound)
  • With just a 4-point lead and 40 seconds to go, Daniel Moore gets fouled after just entering the game for ball-handling purposes and it's only a one-and-one.  He hits BOTH!
Interestingly, it was the two Watford offensive rebounds that led to two buckets by Verdell that sealed the victory.  However, it was IU giving up 18 offensive rebounds to Penn St that allowed this game to stay close.

Verdell did mix in a travel in the final minutes, but for the second game in a row, Verdell has hit 2 big shots late in close games to lead the Hoosiers to victory.

It should also be noted that Christian Watford just missed his second straight double-double with 11 points and 9 rebounds.  The great news for Hoosier fans is that Watford can improve and will improve in so many areas and he's already putting up some pretty nice numbers.  He's leading Big Ten Freshmen in both points and rebounds.

Looking at the stats, the key to victory for the Hoosiers tonight was 3-point shooting.  IU was 9-20 and Penn State was just 4-22.  That's really good to see with both Creek and Roth out of the lineup.  The 3-point shot is so big in college basketball and I was really concerned when this team had a stretch of 2-26 against Illinois and Michigan.  But tonight, they hit 9 three-pointers with 5 different players making one or more -- Dumes (3), Hulls (3), Jones (1), Watford (1), and Elston (1).

The Hoosiers have Iowa at home on Sunday (game moved back 1 hour to 6pm ET to try to avoid too much overlap with the Colts game).  My concern heading into tonight's game was obviously the fact that it was a road game, but also whether the Hoosiers could string together two strong performances.  Well, they did.  So now let's see if they can string together 3 and move to a winning record in conference play.

A couple additional notes that I didn't seem to work in above:

The first note is the play of Jeremiah Rivers tonight.  He opened the game by hitting two 16-foot jumpers very early in this game.  It was very promising and Doc was in the crowd and loving it.  By the way, I love it when Doc is in the crowd.  Unfortunately, the fact that Jeremiah hit those two early jumpers gave him some confidence to keep shooting.  He missed his next 4 jumpers.

Jeremiah was also saddled with foul trouble.  He picked up his 3rd foul late in the first half.  Then, he picked up his 4th early in the second half and his 5th shortly after coming back in the game after sitting for 10+ minutes.  So, he only played 17 minutes total and only 4 minutes in the second half.  In those limited minutes, he was doing his typical thing and had 4 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 steal, and 1 block.  The block was another one of Jeremiah's now patented left-handed blocks.  It seems like once a game there will be an opponent that thinks they have a clear line for a right-handed layup and then Jeremiah comes flying in for a left-handed block.  It's a beautiful thing.

Bawa Muniru saw a couple minutes of action in the first half.  He was able to pull down an offensive rebound.  Now, it wasn't an authoritative rebound, it was more chasing down a long rebound, but it led to a 3-pointer by Elston late in the first half.  Bawa then got whistled for an offensive foul when setting a screen.  To be honest, he got hozed.  It was a good solid screen.  Anyway, I liked seeing him in there even if it was just for a couple minutes.  Shockingly, the main reason he was in there was because Tom Pritchard already had 3 fouls.

Here's to 5 straight hours of sporting bliss on Sunday.  It sure would be a fine day if both the Colts and the Hoosiers would win on Sunday.  Enjoy.

8 comments:

Tom Earth said...

Hoosiers were 10 point underdogs again tonight. Vegas obviously does not respect them. How can theyvbe getting 10 points against a team winless in the BT. Great showing by the Hoosiers.

By the way, if anyone is interested in IU tix, my two are for sale for the rest of the year. Just let me know.

jdhoosier said...

Interesting how you are always aware of the spread. How much have you won with the Hoosiers last 2 victories?

Tom Earth said...

I will tell you outside of this post. I am worried there may be individuals from the IRS on this blog.

It really helped that IU got off to a great start tonight. Dumes is really the X factor with Creek out. He can light it up at a moment's notice. He sure takes some deep 3's. It was really great to see them hold teh lead for the entire game. I hate to bring it up but how nice would that Illinois win look right now. Oh well, nothing they can do about it now. Let's hope they can keep up the same energy on Sunday. I am looking for the Indiana (IU and Colts) sweep.

Anonymous said...

[url=http://vioperdosas.net/][img]http://vioperdosas.net/img-add/euro2.jpg[/img][/url]
[b]windows vista, [url=http://sapresodas.net/]filemaker pro database development[/url]
[url=http://sapresodas.net/]microsoft software update[/url] adobe photo editor software how use coreldraw x4
order software program [url=http://vioperdosas.net/]cheap software com[/url] nero 9 software cheap
[url=http://sapresodas.net/]windows vista activation crack[/url] software market price
[url=http://vioperdosas.net/]price charting software[/url] student discount microsoft office 2007
retail store layout software [url=http://vioperdosas.net/]management software to buy[/url][/b]

Anonymous said...

Gavin said:

Wow! I almost forgot what it was like to win consecutive Big Ten games.
I was listening to ed dechellis yesterday on the Dan Dakich show and it sounds like PSU is having a real identity crisis, but has some nice talent. That ususally spells disasater for us especially on the road.
It seems this team is building confidence with every win and I liked seeing the 10-2 run after Penn St got it close again. I am beginning to like VJ3 more every day. He is becoming one of my all time favorite Hoosiers.
He is playing unbelievably well in the clutch and wants the ball.

Nice to see. Great win.

shealy said...

I may have missed something earlier in the season, but was last night the official unveiling of the Tom Crean half court offense. That's the first time I can remember them being so patient down the stretch in a tight game. There must have been 4 to 5 passes on each possession from 6:00 mark on and no terribly forced shots that I can recall. I hope it was just a coincidence that the patience showed up only when Rivers had fouled out. Watford was awesome on the boards down the stretch.

Finally, I've just about had it with Pritchard. He seems to be getting worse game by game. Elston isn't quite strong enough to bang with the bigs in the conference, but I had to see him losing minutes to Pritchard or Bobby C.

Unknown said...

I have a question: Not to dwell on the spilled milk under the bridge (I love mixed metaphors) but if IU had held on to beat Illinois and stood at 4-2 in the Big Ten, would Tom Crean be the early front runner for Big Ten coach of the year? My vote would be yes!

jdhoosier said...

Andy, I think the Hoosiers just need to step up to the plate and grab the pull by the horn; otherwise, they will be like dominoes falling faster than a house of cards.

Ok, I admit it, I first had to google mixed metaphors and mine was still way weaker yours.

Nicely done, bro (I call him bro because he's my brother; otherwise, it wouldn't make any sense, kind of like saying that your are dead tired. I just learned that "dead tired" is an example of a dead metaphor. Put that in your pipe and chew on it for a while.)